Why does George Bush so badly want our ports controlled by a Middle Eastern company? Having an opinion is one thing (a new thing, possibly) but threatening to veto any opposition when you've never vetoed anything in five years is a little, um... extreme. Yeah, that's the word. There's something extreme about that dude.
President Bush said this afternoon that he would veto any legislation seeking to block the administration's decision to allow a state-owned company from Dubai to assume control of port terminals in New York and other cities.

Mr. Bush's rare veto threat came as Republican leaders and many of their Democratic counterparts called up today for the port takeover to be put on hold. They demanded that the Bush administration conduct a further investigation of the Dubai company's acquisition of the British operator of the six American ports.

"After careful review by our government, I believe the transaction ought to go forward," Mr. Bush told reporters who were traveling with him on Air Force One to Washington, according to news agencies. "I want those who are questioning it to step up and explain why all of a sudden a Middle Eastern company is held to a different standard than a Great British company. I am trying to conduct foreign policy now by saying to the people of the world, 'We'll treat you fairly." '

Resisting an investigation is just stupid. We should investigate ANY company that is going to be controlling our ports.

Support the Hunger SiteSupport the Child Health Site





archives



slimmerangle




Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons License.





This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours? Weblog Commenting and Trackback by HaloScan.com
© Copyright 2004-2008 Ben Mautner. Views expressed are his alone.